Part 1 · 80-minute class
Instructor notes
Idea to Concept: facilitation, discussion questions and checkpoints. Students are welcome to read along.
Before class & facilitation
- Ask students to bring one raw idea and access to ChatGPT and Claude. Check account access and file-generation availability beforehand; keep the online tutorial ready as a fallback.
- Demonstrate one prompt before independent work. Use the fictional GuardianLine example throughout, while students apply each step to their own ideas.
- Time-box each activity. If an AI response stalls, work from the example or pair students rather than losing the discussion time.
- Keep confidential business details and personal customer data out of prompts. Use anonymized examples and check the tools’ data settings.
- Separate evidence from assumptions on every step. Reward specific questions, honest uncertainty and sensible revisions—not polished AI prose.
- Close by asking each student for their chosen customer, biggest remaining risk and next validation action. Carry the MVP brief into the Vibe Coding class.
00:00–00:05
1. Welcome & The Idea Framework
- Ask each student to choose one idea and describe it in a sentence. Then separate the proposed feature from the customer, painful problem and desired outcome.
- Demonstrate with GuardianLine, the fictional senior anti-fraud example: ‘blocks scam calls’ is a feature; helping families protect a senior’s savings is the problem worth investigating.
- Ask: Who experiences the problem, when does it happen, and what do they do today? Finish with a provisional problem statement, not a claim that the business is validated.
00:05–00:20
2. Market Research & Stress Testing
- Use ChatGPT for idea development. Keep steps 1–7 in one ongoing conversation; ask for sources, dates and explicit uncertainty. AI output is a research starting point, not proof of demand.
- Allow 3 minutes to run the prompt, 7 to inspect pain points and competitors, and 5 to discuss the biggest adoption barrier. Include indirect alternatives and doing nothing.
- For GuardianLine, compare carrier call-blocking, bank alerts and family help. Ask whether seniors use these tools and whether an adult child, senior or bank would pay.
- Have students mark each claim as supported, assumed or unknown. Leave with one critical assumption and a customer interview question that asks about past behavior rather than ‘Would you buy this?’.
00:20–00:35
3. Variation & Edge Exploration
- Give students 4 minutes to generate three variations, 6 to compare them and 5 to share a choice. Compare buyer, delivery method, adoption friction and defensibility—not just extra features.
- Use GuardianLine’s senior app, adult-child family plan and bank-licensed service. Ask: Which is easiest to test first? Which could become hard to copy, and why?
- Challenge vague moats such as ‘we use AI.’ Partnerships, distribution or proprietary data may be advantages, but only if realistically obtainable and defensible.
- Leave with one selected variation, a reason for choosing it and the evidence that would make the student change direction.
00:35–00:45
4. Monetization Mechanics
- Spend 3 minutes comparing revenue models, 4 tracing costs and 3 reviewing a simple unit-economics example. Identify the user and payer separately.
- For GuardianLine, contrast a family subscription with bank licensing. Discuss support, screening costs, customer acquisition and the longer bank sales cycle; do not invent validated prices.
- Ask: What remains from one customer’s revenue after variable delivery costs? How much can we afford to acquire that customer? Label price, churn and acquisition estimates as assumptions to test.
- Leave with a preferred revenue model and a short list of costs and pricing questions for real customer conversations.
00:45–00:55
5. The AI Gauntlet
- Give 3 minutes for the persona prompt, 4 for paired discussion and 3 for revision. Make clear that simulated customers and investors are not real validation.
- Ask students to identify the strongest objection, not the most flattering feedback. For GuardianLine, ‘my phone already blocks spam’ challenges differentiation; expensive acquisition challenges the family plan.
- Ask: What evidence would answer this objection? A bank partnership is a hypothesis to investigate, not an automatic fix for acquisition costs.
- Leave with one revision and one experiment addressing the highest-risk objection. Keep critique constructive and focused on assumptions rather than the founder.
00:55–01:00
6. Wrap-Up & Next Steps — MVP Brief
- Treat this as a synthesis checkpoint, not the end of class: go-to-market and the pitch deck follow. Use 3 minutes to generate the brief and 2 to trim it.
- Check that the brief names a customer, problem, value proposition, revenue model, major risks and three validation steps. Strip out features unrelated to testing the central promise.
- For GuardianLine, focus on a family alert workflow rather than promising a complete fraud-prevention system. Discuss consent, privacy and the limits of any protection claim.
- Leave with a one-page brief to carry into Part 2 and one feasible customer conversation or experiment to run next.
01:00–01:10
7. Go-to-Market Strategy
- Spend 3 minutes generating the plan, 4 challenging its channels and 3 choosing the first action. Distinguish founder-led acquisition of the first 10–100 customers from repeatable follow-on growth.
- For GuardianLine, consider caregiver communities or senior centers first, then referrals or a credit-union pilot. Check permissions and access; naming an organization does not establish a partnership.
- Ask: Where exactly can you reach this buyer this week, what will you say, and what response counts as progress? Choose one initial channel rather than spreading effort across every channel.
- Leave with an outreach action, an owner and a date. Treat CAC and conversion rates as testable targets; measure outreach, qualified responses, activation and retention before scaling spend.
01:10–01:20
8. Investor Pitch Deck
- Use Claude for the downloadable PowerPoint. Transfer the refined concept, MVP brief, go-to-market plan and supporting evidence from ChatGPT; a new tool does not know the earlier conversation.
- Allow 4 minutes to generate a first draft, 4 to inspect market and financial slides, and 2 for a short pitch. If generation runs long, review the outline and complete the file after class.
- Check that TAM, SAM and SOM use consistent units, sources and a reachable market. Do not accept a tiny percentage of a huge market as evidence of achievable sales.
- Check five year-columns and rows for revenue, COGS, operating expenses, total costs, gross profit, net profit/loss and cumulative cash flow. Distinguish operating break-even from cumulative cash-flow break-even; either may fall outside the five-year period.
- IRR requires investor cash outflows and inflows, their timing, dilution and an exit or distribution assumption. Ask Claude to disclose those inputs; do not treat a company profit forecast as investor returns or force a positive IRR.
- Leave with a draft deck, clearly labeled assumptions and a list of missing evidence. Never fabricate traction, team credentials, sources or customer quotes.